What if I Weren't a Skeptic?
by David Bloomberg
The title of this article may seem to be a bit of an odd
question. However, let me assure you that Im not going to go into a deep
philosophical discussion here, just a short examination of the way both skeptics and
non-skeptics think.
Let me first say that I consider it an honor to be called a "skeptic." I have
seen it used as an implied insult by some, but to me it says that I am a critical thinker,
and certainly thinking cannot be a bad thing (unless youre a failed school board
candidate, but thats another matter [see "REALLity
Check" in Vol. 3, #10 and "REALLity
Checklist," this issue]).More |
The Sacrament of Confirmation
by Bob Ladendorf
Speaking to a standing-room only crowd of
more than 50 people at the February REALL meeting, Prof. Charles Schweighauser lambasted
astrology and alleged UFO evidence based on principles of physics and astronomy.
Citing various scientific reasons for disproving astrology,
Schweighauser asserted that a human desire to know what the future holds and outright
charlatanism motivated by money are the two main reasons for its continuing appeal. As for
UFOs, he pointed out the high improbability of any physical visitations by aliens based on
the vast distances to travel, extreme mass of fuel to launch a spacecraft at the speed of
light, and the friction of atoms that would tear any craft apart.More |